In Her Web She Still Delights

Calendar

««Jul 2008»»
SMTWTFS
  
1
2
3
45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031

Get mail when I update

Would you want the rows in your garden to be labelled with singulars or plurals?
Singular: there's only one kind of plant there
Plural: since there's more than one plant, the label should reflect that
Don't care: as long as I can read it, the details are unimportant
For passwords, additional information, private comments, and more humerous anecdotes, please email carrie@in-her-web.blog-city.com.

Very Adept

posted Wednesday, 14 February 2007

Some of you may remember Minor Magicks, a D&D 3.5 supplement that I wrote for Silverthorne Games a few years ago.  I admit that I am not above going to RPGNow occasionally to read the really nice things that people say about my piece, and there's even been a new one added recently that was, in general, quite complimentary.  However, he did point out one flaw: in my spells-by-class listing at the end, I neglected to include the adept, despite the fact that these low-level, practical spells are precisely the kind of thing adepts should logically be good at.  To which I respond, d'oh!  Quite right; thank you, Mr. O'Connor, for pointing that out.

So if any of you out there feel you need authorial dispensation to add a spell to a class spell list, I'm officially saying that every new spell in Minor Magicks is castable by adepts.  Generally, assign levels by determining what level the PC classes have them at, then give them to the adepts at the level of druid, cleric, bard, wiz/sor, in that order--that is, if it's 2 for a druid and 3 for a cleric, give it to them at 2; if it's 3 for a bard and 2 for a wizard, give it to them at 3, etc.

Shukenja, favored souls, wu jen, spirit shamans...you're on your own there; I don't think even Complete Warrior was out yet when I turned in my manuscript.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit